Committed to the legacy of his compelling father, there was never any question about where
John F.
Kennedy Jr. was heading. Is there any doubt about the fact that it was only a matter of
time
before he claimed his father’s legacy? Anybody who claims that we will never really know,
does not
know anything about John F. Kennedy Jr.
John F. Kennedy Jr. was the only political asset in America who was intelligent and
sophisticated
enough to rise above party politics. In life, he was untouchable. Yet as soon as he died,
right
wing mouthpiece William Saffire attributed his death to "bad judgment". The media rumor
mill
predictably called him reckless. After all, he was his father's son, wasn't he? Indeed, he
was.
Only a bullet could stop the father, and only a staged accident, could stop the son. The
Kennedys
were men of unchallengeable will. In the case of the father, he could single-handedly stop
the
Vietnam war, and in the case of the son, the Presidency was his for the asking.
Now that he is not around to set the record straight, political partisans plant words in
his
mouth, and use his dead body as a platform to score political points. The widely circulated
rumor
that Kennedy's ambition to become a candidate for the US Senate was thwarted by Hillary
Rodham
Clinton, reflects the partisan, political cheapshots that are lobbied about, at the expense
of a
mute, John F. Kennedy Jr. Chris Matthews likes to promote the claim that if Kennedy ran
against
Hillary, it would have been a landslide, even though there was never any intention. While
partisans lobby baloney, the truth of the matter is that John F. Kennedy Jr. terrified
them. He
terrified them because if media darling George W. Bush Jr., won the election in 2000, John
F.
Kennedy Jr. would have been 42 in 2004, and all he had to do was walk into the Bush
Presidency.
Kennedy did not challenge Hillary Rodham Clinton. Kennedy challenged George Bush.
Like the official claim that Lee Harvey Oswald murdered JFK, the ludicrous, unexamined
proposition
that John F. Kennedy Jr. is single-handedly responsible for his own death is vigorously
contradicted by ordinary, intelligent Americans rather than by official investigation.
Consider
the simple logic of the following, intelligent post:
"Here is the crucial UPI article datelined July 17, 2:08 GMT, which states that JFK Jr. was in contact with flight controllers at Martha's vineyard Airport at 9:39 Friday evening, July
16. The
UPI article also states that both WCVB-TV in Boston AND ABCNews reported the same crucialL
information. Additionally this radio contact by Kennedy has subsequently been confirmed
through
direct contact with airport personnel. This extremely significant information is what is
now
missing from every single account of the event now being disseminated by mass media
outlets. This
crucial information has been removed from the public record because it utterly invalidates the
"official" "story" about the cause of JFK JR'S death.
This crucial information proves that seconds before Kennedy's plane went into a headlong
dive
there was not the slightest indication of the much-regurgitated babble that pilot error
and/or
mechanical malfunction (other than outright sabotage of a critical component of the
aircraft) were
responsible for this headlong, full-on nosedive to certain oblivion. Neither such fictional
pilot
error nor any standard mechanical malfunction could possibly result in this craft dropping
like a
rock. Kennedy was at that moment engaged in no unusual or troublesome maneuvers. He had
only A
second before he finished his radio call. He knew exactly where he was not only in
relationto the
coastline but also to the airport--10 miles from the coast and 13 miles from the airport.
What's
more, we have received additional confirmation from residents of the Connecticut shore and
Martha's Vineyard that visibility was excellent in the area at this time--from 10 to 12
miles at
least. In such conditions it's ludicrous to think that Kennedy would not been able to have
seen at
least the glow from the many lights in the well-populated Martha's Vineyard area at the
distance
he was, and thus have been thoroughly able to distinguish direction in all senses of the
word
(altitude).
The ongoing disinformation about poor visibility being the reason such an inexperienced
pilot
(which he WAS NOT!) would get completely discombobulated and fly into the sea is completely
unfounded in fact. The guy was hardly hundreds of miles out over the middle of the
Atlantic. Why
then would he decide to land in the sea if he knew where he was in relation to the land?
Please...
spare me. Here is the pertinent text from about halfway through the UPI article. This is
the
truth... before the spin-doctors and manipulators got to work. "At 9:39 p.m. Friday,
Kennedy
radioed the airport and said he was 13 miles from the airport and 10 miles from the coast,
according to WCVB-TV news in Boston. He reportedly said he was making his final aproach."
Moments later, radar operated by the Federal Aviation Administration showed the plane went into a
dive and
dropped 1,200 feet in just 12 seconds, according to ABC News. "In his final approach
message,
WCVB-TV said Kennedy told controllers at the airport that he planned to drop off his wife's
sister
and then take off again between 11 p.m. and 11:30 p.m. for Hyannis Airport."
Other crucial information which has now been removed from all official accounts is the fact
that a
number of witnesses on the beach at Martha's Vineyard that evening including a Vineyard
Gazette
reporter saw an airborne explosion at this same time right in that area of the sky where
Kennedy
was flying.
I quote here the relevant text from the UPI article. "A reporter for the Vineyard Gazette
newspaper told WCVB-TV in Boston that he was out walking Friday night about the time of the
crash
and saw "a big white flash in the sky" off Philbin Beach." A report from about 3PM on
Saturday by
Shepherd Smith of FOX-TV named another one of these witnesses--in fact a guest at the
scheduled
wedding JFK. Jr. was due to attend and a friend of Smith's producer at Fox. Every single
flight
instructor Kennedy ever had as well as other first-hand witnesses describe Kennedy as an
extremely
cautious and safety minded pilot. He also had hundreds of hours of experience, not one
hundred.
For example here's aquote from a CNN article in which a Fderal Pilot Examiner who tested
Kennedy's flying skills describes his abilities.
ORLANDO, Florida (Reuters) -- A federal pilot examiner who tested John F. Kennedy Jr.'s
flying
skills said he was an "excellent pilot," a newspaper reported Sunday.... "He was an
excellent
pilot," John McColgan of Vero Beach, Florida, told the Orlando Sentinel."I put him through
the
paces, and he passed everything with flying colors."...
He said Kennedy had a lot of flight experience for someone with a pilot's license for 15
months...
"He flew a lot," McColgan said. "In fact, by now he probably has enough hours to be a commercial pilot...."
I rest my case. JFK Jr.'s plane crash was NOT an accident.
And even if the weather was bad enough to impair JFK Jr.'s vision, it would not have mattered because Kennedy's plane had autopilot, capable of flying itself to within 100 feet of the airport and all a "cautious and methodical" pilot like JFK Jr., had to do was sit back and let the plane fly itself. Autopilot makes the jobs of pilots easier the way high-tech medical equipment helps surgeons at their job. It's all very advanced and expensive and ultimately engineered to keep pilots and passengers safe and alive.
What is even more disturbing is that on the Monday after JFK Jr.'s plane went down, Cindy
Adams
did a story quoting C. David Heymann. C. David Heymann was Cindy's source for the early
story that
JFK was worried about landing at Martha's Vineyard, but reckless enough to try it.
Heymann's
written Kennedy books on Jackie and Bobby. Unauthorized. The Kennedy family is not thrilled
with
this man.
For years Cindy Adams had done interviews with him, without incident. This time he told her
he'd
had a chat with John in what turned out to be the final period of his life.
Under the instant horrendous circumstances, it being a weekend, verification wasn't
possible.
Nobody answered Kennedy office phones Saturday or Sunday so Cindy Adams accepted Heymann's
story.
Kennedy insiders subsequently told her this conversation he reportedly had with John never
took
place. They said his name was not down in any JFK log books, and John's appointment
secretary
didn't have him in any listing.
So why were all these people fabricating the claim that John F. Kennedy was a reckless
pilot?
That's extremely incriminating evidence of a cover up, and what was learned during
Watergate is
still true. It's not the crime, it's the cover up, stupid.
Given the fact that scattered luggage items washed up on shore, researchers suspect a small bomb
was placed in JFK Jr.'s luggage. The luggage compartment in a Saratoga is behind the rear seats, in the center of the fueselage. According to the official NTSB report, "Portions of five of the six seats were found inside the fuselage. The sixth seat was not recovered."
It appears that the bomb that was in the luggage was powerful enough to blast one of the seats out of the airplane and into the Atlantic, where it was never found.
Under the circumstances, JFK Jr.'s plane probably crashed due to an improvised explosive device detonated with a force that was powerful enough to make one seat disappear into the sea. One missing seat implies a specific shatter zone which is consistent with the damage that an explosive device would make.
The destruction area that can cause one seat to disappear is typically described as if a rather large shotgun had gone off at close range.
Unlike a bomb explosion, the soot and explosive residue that is left by a small explosive device is so minimal that it is easy to miss, in the sea.
Clearly, if the New York Post promoted a false story to account for a plane crash, the real story is the explosion that originated in the luggage compartment behind the seat that was never recovered.
Comments - Questions? -
