SEARCH | Computers | Cameras | Music | Books | Software | Travel | Toys | Games | Jewellery | News
 

Bill O'Reilly has lost his credibility
The best analysis money can't buy
Bill O'Reilly
 
 

Bill O'Reilly is an anti-intellectual, anti-hippie "individualist" (to use his own characterization) who stands for nothing.

If you are against everything, you stand for nothing, and you ultimately, albeit inadvertently, become a force of evil because you rant and rave like a lunatic in a vacuous, self-cancelling polarity that indiscriminantly divides the world into "us" versus "them".

This self-proclaimed corruption buster is ultimately a hypocrite because he preaches what he rails against.

If Bill O'Reilly wants to change his hateful and evil ways, he has to adopt the philosophy of the sage who said, "Good men do not argue. Those who argue are not good. Those who know are not learned. Those who are learned do not know."

Do not hate a man like Bill O'Reilly. Passion is explosive. Talk to Tiger Wood's wife about that. What you have to with a child like Billy O'Reilly is to give him something to rail about. For example, why doesn't he rail about this?

O'Reilly reminds me of Lyndon Johnson, does he have a mistress too?

Tell you one thing, if he doesn't, it's because this self-professed, "cultural warrior" would rather make war than love. Nevertheless, it would be silly to ignore Lyndon Johnson'e evil dimension because it also proved to be lethal.

O'Reilly equates liberalism with permissiveness. In O'Reilly's world, Liberals are evil because they enable mindless violence.

Billy O'Reilly is a paradox. Most intelligent and reasonable people oppose violence and war. Mr. O'Reilly promotes and encourages it because in his view, the only way to defeat a bully is to be a bigger bully. Does he not understand the problem? Has he ever stopped to appreciate the lesson he is teaching?

Mr. O'Reilly's "us against them" mentality is simply counterproductive and his tendency to call anybody who does not share his perspective a "lefty loonie" is rather baffling given his tendency to be a zany buffoon. That's right, if everybody that Bill O'Reilly does not agree with is a "lefty loonie" then he is a zany buffoon who attacks good people because he is simply too crazed to be anything but a zany buffoon.

In a nutshell, Bill O'Reilly is essentially trying to destroy what he perceives to be bullies by being one himself, and that makes his mission rather futile.

The mother of all ironies: Bill O'Reilly claims that he takes the "chasing villains deal very seriously." He thinks it is absolutely necessary to "ambush villains" but in fact, there is no evidence to suggest that Billy O'Reilly even knows what a villain is -and therein lies the problem -many of the people that O'Reilly "ambushes" are not villains, they are merely targets of grotesque ignorance.

Take Dan Rather, for example, he was "ambushed" by the O'Reilly mentality and now, Dan Rather, a competent and adequate journalist, has become the favorite whipping boy of the O'Reilly mentality.

Needless to say, Dan Rather was a victim of those who use all their resources to evade scrutiny, and it is safe to say that if it was O'Reilly, who had "ambushed" Bush the way that Rather did, the very same people who are currently attacking Dan Rather, would be attacking Bill O'Reilly.

Leave it to us to set the record straight. We are not telling you what to do, what to think or who to ambush. The facts do that all by themselves. Unfortunately, the only thing that Bill O'Reilly has ambushed is his own credibility and that is very unfortunate because we can certainly use his passion.

On October 13, 2004, O'Reilly filed a lawsuit against O'Reilly Factor producer Andrea Mackris, her lawyer Benedict P. Morelli, and Morelli's law firm for extortion, contending Mackris had privately threatened to charge O'Reilly with sexual harassment unless he paid her more than $60 million (USD). Later that same day, Mackris filed a complaint of sexual harassment against O'Reilly. Mackris claimed that O'Reilly had made sexually explicit phone calls, including a "vile and degrading monologue about sex." O'Reilly denied engaging in any physical or sexual assault or "offensive touching." He also alleged that Mackris' motives were financial and political in nature. According to newspaper reports, O'Reilly likely paid Mackris millions of dollars as part of a settlement, whereby both lawsuits were dismissed, but the terms of the out-of-court agreement are confidential. The lawsuit was dropped on October 28, 2004.

What do we do now Billy? You do not believe in rehabillitation so what do we do about you now?

Bill O'Reilly (alleged) quote: "So anyway I'd be rubbing your big boobs and getting your nipples really hard, kinda' kissing your neck from behind ... and then I would take the other hand with the falafel thing and I'd put it on your p(xxx)y but you'd have to do it really light, just kind of a tease business..."

WAKE UP AMERICA. Obama said it best in a single sentence: "WE WERE SENT HERE TO SERVE OUR CITIZENS, NOT OUR AMBITIONS." WAKE UP AMERICA.

If you don't want to listen to us, listen to somebody like Bill Moyers, he's probably the wisest man in America.


 

 
NEWSWORLD SHOWDOWN
Copyright 2010
 

 
 

 
travel
 

HOME        VIDEO         MESSAGES       SHOP         FOX         SPORTS       HISTORY

 
 
guess who?