| 897 |
Date: 2004-10-10 02:53:38 David Sween The bizarre effort to link Scott Peterson to the murder of Laci through a tidal expert has turned the case against Scott Peterson into a grotesque circus. The absurdity of backtracking to the location where a body might have been dumped in the bay, over a lengthy period of time, is very clear, especially since we do not know if, where, or for how long Laci's body was weighted down. Moreover, weather conditions change surface currents and you have to be able to calculate resistive forces, to be able to predict a driving force. How can you possibly calculate the distance and the direction that a body floats in the water, if you do not know when the weights were released from the body? When you combine natural variables, including the time of day and the moon cycle, etc., with the failure to determine where, how or if Laci's body had ever been anchored, it is absolutely not possible to determine where a particular body will move or relocate. The suggestion that a hydrologist could trace a body from where Scott Peterson allegedly dumped Laci on December 24, 2003 to where she was found 4 1/2 months later, in time to arrest Scott on April 18, 2004 is so preposterous that it merits absoute ridicule. If Peterson had in fact dumped Laci in the Bay in the middle of the day, at high tide, it would have been more likely for the body to commence it's outward journey towards the ocean with the ebb tide, rather than to be recovered precisely as expected, in a popular, dog-walking park, just in time to make it absolutely impossible for the stubborn, Modesto Police Department, to refuse to arrest Scott Peterson. That is clearly what the tide of events proves. Laci was walking her dog when she was kidnapped and a woman walking her dog discovered the body. It is clearly easier to believe that the bodies were deliberately planted, to be found by a stranger, than to suggest that a tidal expert has any answers about the murder of Laci. This cover up to implicate Scott Peterson is too sophisticated to be the work of amateurs. The intended targets were deliberately selected to confuse investigators about the slaying of another innocent, Chandra Levy, who was probably murdered because she refused to cooperate with those who wanted to use her private, sexual life to destroy Gary Condit's political career. The kidnapping of Laci Peterson predictably and effectively shifted the national focus from Chandra Levy, to Laci Peterson and it is no coincidence that both their bodies were finally recovered without a hint of traceable evidence - the mark of professional culprits who target scapegoats. |
|
| 1/30/03 | DIVERTING BLAME | ||||||||||
| 2/21/03 | EARLY REPORTS | ||||||||||
| 3/16/03 | SUSPICIOUS MINDS | ||||||||||
| 3/21/03 | AMBER FREY | ||||||||||
| 4/04/03 | MEDIA SPIN | ||||||||||
| 4/10/03 | SMOKING GUN? | ||||||||||
| 3/16/03 | MARK GERAGOS | ||||||||||
| 5/07/03 | TERRORIZING WITNESSES | ||||||||||
| 9/23/03 | JAILHOUSE SNITCHES | ||||||||||
| 10/20/03 | LARRY KING LIVE TAKEOVER | ||||||||||
| 11/22/03 | CONNER PETERSON | ||||||||||
| 01/14/04 | CENSORING THE TRUTH
| 02/06/04 |
THE REAL SCOOP | 02/16/04 |
VIVIAN MITCHELL DIES | 02/18/04 |
WHO IS FRAMING SCOTT | 10/22/04 |
JURY TAMPERING | CSI |
FORENSIC SCIENCE | |